| Vaccination Liberation - Information |
|
The Artificially Sweetened Times The
Artificially Sweetened Times is a community service publication
sponsored by
The
Idaho Observer newspaper and produced in cooperation with
Mission Possible and Vaccination Liberation. Editor:
Don Harkins Associate Editor: Ingri Cassel Copies
of The Artificially Sweetened Times, a 24-page, 8 ½ x
11 booklet, are available for $35 per 100—shipping included.
Circulate this publication among friends, family and throughout your
community. The future of America could very well depend upon the
removal of aspartame (and now neotame) from our food supply. (Call
for quantity prices and tips on how to distribute The Artificially Sweetened Times
What is
happening to our children? Aspartame: Long
before achieving FDA approval for use in foods, beverages and drugs,
the safety of synthetic sweetener aspartame has been the subject of
much controversy. It has even been characterized as a poison linked
to a variety of ailments (See FDA list of complaints/symptoms page
10). A growing
body of scientists, doctors and laypeople insist aspartame disease is
an ignored epidemic and an underlying cause of chronic ill-health in
America. Conversely, aspartame producers, food and beverage industry
trade associations, government regulators and some scientists and
physicians claim aspartame is safe and its worst characteristic is
that it's non-nutritive. Are
aspartame and other synthetic sweeteners like saccharin, Splenda and
Neotame harmless? Or are they government-approved poisons? The
answers to these questions are found in the scientific research and
thousands of testimonies from current and former aspartame consumers.
Government declares war
|
|
Worldwide aspartame
production, GROWTH OF WORLDWIDE ASPARTAME MARKET (in tonnes) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1982 1986 1991 1995 |
U.S 220 5100 8000 10200 |
Europe 30 430 1400 1800 |
Canada 100 120 400 500 |
Japan 5 40 80 140 |
RoW* 15 40 120 500 |
Total 370 5730 10000 13140 |
|
2003—Nutrasweet claims 250 million people worldwide use "high intensity" sweeteners for annual sales of $1.1 billion. Since its 1981 approval for use in dry goods, aspartame has been approved for beverages, processed foods and medical preparations. Today some 7,000 products contain aspartame. [RoW* = Rest of World] | ||||||
|
Searle CEO Rumsfeld reversed aspartame non-approval tide By 1976, the G.D. Searle Company's campaign to achieve the approval of aspartame was mired in controversy. Amid objections to aspartame approval formally filed by consumer advocate attorney Jim Turner and neuroscientist John Olney, MD, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched an investigation into Searle's laboratory practices. The FDA determined that the aspartame developer's testing procedures were shoddy, producing inaccurate results due to manipulated data. The investigators stated in their 1976 report they, "...had never seen anything as bad as Searle's testing." The FDA report prompted a grand jury investigation led by U.S. Attorney Samuel Skinner. Six months later, Skinner left the U.S. attorney's office to take a position at Searle's law firm Sidley & Austin. By March, 1977 Searle had hired former Illinois congressman and former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as its CEO. By Dec., 1977, the statute of limitations had run out on the grand jury investigation and charges against Searle were dropped by the U.S. attorney's office. Though opposition to aspartame approval was increasingly being supported by independent scientific studies, Rumsfeld's political muscle prevailed. On July 15, 1981, in one of his first official acts as FDA commissioner under Ronald Reagan, Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr., approved aspartame for use in dry products. ![]() Former Searle CEO/current U.S. Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld. |
Pages 3-4Sweet Slavery:
|
|
Page 5 How aspartame causes damage to the bodyWhen a matter is in controversy, the fair and civilized manner of solving it is allowing both parties of a dispute to bring their evidence before an impartial body. Once both sides have presented their evidence, the impartial body is adequately prepared to settle the matter based upon the facts. Were such a forum used to determine the safety of aspartame, the substance would no longer be an item of controversy and would no longer be poisoning a trusting public. compiled by Don Harkins Prior to and since its 1981 FDA approval, an international who's who of scientific minds have been producing peer-reviewable reports warning against the dietary use of aspartame. To my knowledge, not one of these studies has been duplicated and scientifically determined to be in error. What this means is that, until new, peer-reviewable science is published to the contrary, aspartame is linked to the FDA's list of 92 reported symptoms (see page 10). It also means that anyone who consumes aspartame is a candidate for a broad spectrum of physiological and psychological complications that include blindness, insanity and/or death. But there will be no new, credible, peer-reviewable science to reveal that aspartame is safe. There wasn't any in 1965, 1981, 1983, 1985 or at any time since then. If you take a look at the "Aspartame: Point/Counterpoint" pages 7-8, you will see that published science and field experience easily refute claims promoting aspartame safety. |
|
Page 6 How diet soda becomes poisonIn 1997, 11-year-old Jennifer Cohen saved her babysitting money for lab tests to measure how aspartame breaks down in cans before ingestion by consumers. With $1,250 this young girl was able to produce peer-reviewable results that Searle, Monsanto and the FDA, with their $multi-million budgets, state-of-the-art testing facilities and scientists, could not. On January 21, 1997, Jennifer Cohen bought a case of Diet Coke. She put seven cans in the refrigerator (36 degrees F.), seven cans in her bedroom (69 degrees F.) and seven cans in an incubator set at 104 degrees F. She checked the temperatures daily for 10 weeks. The remaining cans she took to Winston Laboratories in New Jersey. The cans were found to contain .06 percent aspartame. Prior to conducting her experiments, she discovered that aspartame was being consumed by over 100 million Americans and that aspartame has a shelf life of 262 days at 77 degrees F. Her research also revealed that the FDA gets more complaints about aspartame than any other substance and; that aspartame use has been linked to brain tumors, seizures and symptoms mimicking multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. On April 1, 1997, Cohen took the refrigerated, room temperature and incubated cans of pop to Winston Labs for analysis. The refrigerated cans showed aspartame diminished to .0058 percent with .001 percent DKP and 53.5 parts per billion (ppb) formaldehyde. The room temperature samples showed .0051 percent aspartame, .002 percent DKP and 231 ppb formaldehyde. The incubated samples showed .026 percent aspartame, .010 percent DKP and 76.2 ppb formaldehyde. The higher the temperature, the more DKP; room temperature produced the highest levels of formaldehyde. Cohen also conducted a double-blind taste test and found that "fresh" diet Coke was preferred and the incubated samples scored the lowest. "The FDA says, ‘we believe, based upon all the information we received to date, that this is a safe product,'" Cohen wrote. "I say, ‘Decide for yourself,'" she concluded. Cohen's entire 1997 study can be found at www.dorway.com |
|
Pages 7-8 Aspartame: Point/CounterpointThe National Diabetic Association and the International Food Information Council (IFIC) maintain that the government-approved artificial sweetener aspartame is safe for use in foods, beverages and medicines. Below are answers to frequently asked questions regarding aspartame safety. The questions are first answered (in italics) as posed by the IFIC then refuted (in normal typeface) with analyses supported by published scientific and medical literature. The original 1995 IFIC article, "Everything you need to know about aspartame," as rebutted by Mark Gold (complete with fully cited references to published scientific reports), is available in its entirety at www.dorway.com. What is aspartame made of?Aspartame is made by joining two protein components, aspartic acid and phenylalanine, and a small amount of methanol. Aspartic acid and phenylalanine are building blocks of protein and are found naturally in all protein-containing foods, including meats, grains and dairy products. Methanol is found naturally in the body and in many foods such as fruit and vegetable juices. Aspartame-containing products also contain breakdown products of aspartame such as beta-aspartame (Lawrence 1987, Stamp 1989) and aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine (DKP) (Tsang 1985). Because the amino acids are not bound in proteins, they are absorbed quickly and spike the plasma aspartic acid and phenylalanine to high levels. Even the industry researchers admit that these amino acids are metabolized differently than those found in foods (Stegink 1987a, Stegink 1987b). Methanol is found in available form in much greater quantities in aspartame than in real foods (Monte 1984). Methanol taken orally is extremely toxic to humans. Even though a small amount is found in the body, as little as one can of diet soda can spike the plasma methanol levels significantly (Davoli 1986). How is aspartame handled by the body?Aspartame is digested just like any other protein. Upon digestion, aspartame breaks down into its basic components and is absorbed into the blood. Neither aspartame nor its components accumulate in the body over time. Formic acid (a toxic metabolite of methanol) likely can accumulate in the organs (Liesivuori 1991). No one knows if DKP or a metabolite of DKP accumulates in the body over time. Proper tests have not been conducted. Aspartic acid may accumulate for a significant amount of time like another excitotoxic amino acid, glutamic acid (Toth 1981). Much of the damage caused by aspartic acid and glutamic acid ingested orally is clearly laid out by Dr. Russell Blaylock, Professor of Neurosurgery, in his well-referenced book, "Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills." Either way, gradual damage can be caused by aspartame breakdown products even when they do not accumulate. A chemical does not have to accumulate to cause damage. Can aspartame be used in cooking or baking? Aspartame's components separate when heated over time, resulting in a loss of sweetness. Therefore, aspartame is not recommended for use in recipes requiring lengthy heating or baking. It may, however, be added at the end of the cooking cycle in some recipes. If a food containing aspartame is inadvertently heated, it would still be safe, but would simply not provide the desired sweetness. Any heating, even at the end of cooking, will cause DKP and free phenylalanine to quickly form. Significant amounts of DKP are formed when aspartame is stored in liquid form at room temperature. Heating will speed that process considerably. See Tsang (1985) discussed above. Is aspartame safe?As a governmental agency charged with safeguarding the American food supply, the FDA has concluded that aspartame is safe for the general public, including diabetics, pregnant and nursing women, and children. Persons with a rare hereditary disease known as phenylketonuria (PKU) must control their phenylalanine intake from all sources, including aspartame. These persons are diagnosed at birth by a blood test performed on all babies. Products sweetened with aspartame carry a statement on the label that they contain phenylalanine. In 1981 the FDA's Public Board of Inquiry, made up of scientists (including the President of the American Association of Neuropathologists), voted unanimously against approval of aspartame. The board believed the brain tumor data was "worrisome." As the pages of the AS Times will demonstrate, aspartame's FDA approval was secured by the political influence of Donald Rumsfeld, not as a result of safety-proving science. |
|
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SYMPTOMS attributed to ASPARTAME in complaints submitted to the FDA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| REPORTED SYMPTOMS | NO. OF COMPLAINTS | % OF REPORTS |
% OF COMPLAINTS |
| HEADACHE | 1847 | 21.1% | 19.0% |
| DIZZINESS/POOR EQUILIBRIUM | 735 | 11.2% | 7.5% |
| CHANGE OF MOOD | 656 | 10.0% | 6.7% |
| VOMITTING OR NAUSEA | 647 | 9.8% | 6.6% |
| ABDOMINAL PAIN AND CRAMPS | 483 | 6.9% | 4.7% |
| CHANGE IN VISION | 362 | 5.5% | 3.7% |
| DIARRHEA | 330 | 5.0% | 3.4% |
| SEIZURES AND CONVULSIONS | 290 | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| MEMORY LOSS | 255 | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| FATIGUE, WEAKNESS | 242 | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| OTHER NEUROLOGICAL | 230 | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| RASH | 226 | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| SLEEP PROBLEMS | 201 | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| HIVES | 191 | 2.9% | 2.0% |
| CHANGE IN HEART RATE | 85 | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| ITCHING | 175 | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| GRAN MAL | 172 | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| LOCAL SWELLING | 14 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| CHANGE IN ACTIVITY LEVEL | 113 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| DIFFICULTY BREATHING | 112 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| ORAL SENSORY CHANGES | 108 | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| CHANGE IN MENSTRUAL PATTERN | 107 | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| SYMPTOMS REPORTED BY LESS THAN 100 COMPLAINTS | 1812 | -- | 18.6% |
DISTRIBUTION of REACTIONS to ASPARTAME by product name. | |||
| REPORTED SYMPTOMS | NO. OF COMPLAINTS | % OF REPORTS | % OF COMPLAINTS |
| DIET SOFT DRINKS | 3021 | 45.9% | 38.3% |
| TABLE TOP SWEETNER | 1716 | 26.1% | 21.7% |
| PUDDINGS - GELATINS | 633 | 9.6% | 8.0% |
| LEMONADE | 410 | 6.2% | 5.2% |
| OTHER | 346 | 5.3% | 4.4% |
| KOOL AID | 339 | 5.1% | 4.3% |
| ICED TEA | 319 | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| CHEWING GUM | 319 | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| FROZEN CONFECTIONS | 136 | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| CEREAL | 119 | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| SUGAR SUBSTITUTE TABLETS | 71 | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| BREATH MINTS | 62 | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| PUNCH MIX | 45 | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| FRUIT DRINKS | 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| NON-DAIRY TOPPINGS | 8 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| CHEWABLE MULTI-VITAMINS | 8 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| FRUIT, DRIED | 1 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
How much aspartame may people consume?The FDA uses the concept of an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for many food additives, including aspartame. The ADI represents an intake level that, if maintained each day throughout a person's lifetime, would be considered safe by a wide margin. The ADI for aspartame has been set at 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight. The FDA's ADI was determined by tests conducted with mice—not humans. Mice are able to metabolize methanol, for instance, much more efficiently than humans. All independent experiments using much less than the FDA's ADI show aspartame causes problems in humans. Therefore, the FDA's ADI with regard to aspartame is not an accurate measure of safe levels for consumption in people. How much aspartame are people actually consuming today? The FDA monitors the amount of aspartame that Americans consume through ongoing dietary surveys. The average daily intake of Americans who consume aspartame has remained fairly constant since July 1984, averaging less than 2 percent of the FDA guideline for acceptable consumption. The most frequent consumers of aspartame are consuming only 4 percent to 7 percent of the ADI. Children have been shown to consume far more than the FDA's ADI on an on-going basis and even overweight adults can consume more than half of the FDA's ADI on an ongoing basis (Frey 1976, Porikos 1984). The steady increase in consumption of aspartame since 1984 (see page 2 and USDA Situation and Outlook Report; Sugar and Sweeteners, 1988) indicates the mathematical impossibility of IFIC claims. How was aspartame tested before it was approved for use in foods? Aspartame is one of the most thoroughly studied ingredients in the food supply. It was tested in more than 100 scientific studies prior to its approval by the FDA in 1981. These tests were conducted in animals and humans, including normal adults and children, lactating women and persons with diabetes, obesity and special genetic conditions. Aspartame was tested in amounts many times higher than individuals could consume in the diet. Today scientists continue to conduct new studies on this sweetener as they do many other ingredients used in the food supply. The FDA also monitors and evaluates all research on this and other food ingredients. If the studies to which IFIC refers exist, they are not part of the public record. IFIC has not provided copies of or even citations for these "more than 100 scientific studies" for peer review. Have independent physicians and dietitians reviewed the safety of aspartame? Yes. The American Medical Association's Council on Scientific Affairs reviewed research on aspartame and found the sweetener to be safe. The American Dietetic Association also has concluded that moderate use of aspartame is acceptable as part of a healthy diet. The American Medical Association's Council on "Scientific" Affairs, in 1985, merely restated comments made by FDA Commissioner Hayes in the Federal Register when he ignored the Public Board of Inquiry ruling and his own scientific team of experts in 1981. The American Dietetic Association (ADA), which receives generous contributions from Monsanto, admitted that NutraSweet assists in the writing of its "fact" sheets (ADA 1993). Can persons with diabetes consume aspartame? Yes. The American Diabetes Association has stated that aspartame is acceptable as a sugar substitute and can be included in a diabetic meal plan.
H.J. Roberts, MD, has been studying the effects of aspartame on diabetics for 20 years. He has noticed significant metabolic, neurologic, vision and other problems in diabetics that remedy themselves when aspartame is removed from the diabetic diet. Dr. Roberts' observations can be found in his meticulously referenced work, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" (see page 23). It was reported in 1995, the American Diabetes Association received generous annual contributions from Monsanto. Is aspartame safe for people with epilepsy? Yes. The Epilepsy Institute, an organization devoted to people suffering from seizure-related problems, has concluded that aspartame is not related to seizures among epileptic patients. The Epilepsy Institute is not the Epilepsy Foundation, but a Monsanto-funded epilepsy center in New York. This entity has never submitted properly conducted tests on aspartame and seizures for peer review. Independent research (Camfield 1992, Elsas 1988, Walton 1986, Walton 1988) has shown that seizures are one of the most common adverse reactions linked to aspartame usage. Has aspartame been found to affect children's behavior? No. Studies have shown that aspartame consumption does not affect the behavior of children, including those diagnosed as hyperactive or with attention deficit disorder. Scientists who believe children's behavior might be affected by aspartame and who saw case histories of erratic behavior from children on aspartame believed that it was the medium to long-term use of aspartame that often led to these changes. Some scientists believed it was the constant spiking of plasma phenylalanine levels that led to brain chemistry changes. Industry "researchers" conducted numerous experiments of very short length, often using encapsulated aspartame (which reduced the plasma phenylalanine spike) and then declared that there was no effect on children. They also averaged the results of all the children in each group so that if a few children were sensitive, their results would get lost in the averages. Independent, double-blind studies on children with behavior problems have yet to be conducted. However, when independent researchers conducted blinded studies of aspartame they have invariably found problems. Can aspartame cause visual damage? No. Scientists know that only huge quantities of methanol can affect vision. A small amount of methanol is formed when aspartame is digested or when its components separate. However, the amount of methanol one could possibly consume from aspartame is well within safe levels, and is actually less than that found in many fruit and vegetable juices. The relationship between methanol and blindness has been known for decades. The relationship between macular degeneration and aspartame was explained to Congress in 1987 by methanol expert and eye specialist, Dr. Morgan B. Raiford. Dr. Raiford testified about one of the many persons he had seen with eye damage from aspartame. Per his paper (Raiford 1987), he described how the deterioration of Shannon Roth's eyes (due to methanol poisoning attributed to NutraSweet) "...was identical to the damage I observed repeatedly in the eyes of individuals whose eyes have been damaged by methyl alcohol toxicity." Dr. Raiford's work was supported in 1991 (Cook and Bergman, et al). Do some people have adverse reactions to aspartame? There is no scientific evidence that aspartame is linked to adverse reactions in people. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reviewed some 500 consumer complaints related to aspartame in 1984. CDC concluded that there was no specific group of symptoms clearly related to aspartame consumption. The FDA has investigated all complaints since 1984, and has stated that there is "no consistent or unique pattern of symptoms reported with respect to aspartame that can be causally linked to its use." Individuals who have concerns about possible adverse reactions to aspartame should contact their physicians. Adverse reactions to aspartame comprise about 80 percent of product complaints to the FDA. Contrary to IFIC claims, independently produced, double-blind studies showing adverse reactions in humans to aspartame have been published (Camfield, et al, 1992; Elsas, Trotter 1988; Koehler, Glaros 1988; Kulczycki 1995; Spiers, et al, 1988; Van den Eeden, et al, 1994; Walton 1993). |
Aspartame's curious rise to marketplace successIn 1980, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Public Board of Inquiry ordered that G.W. Searle Company's petition for aspartame approval be withdrawn. The FDA concluded that it had not been presented with evidence of aspartame safety and "may contribute to the development of brain tumors." The order was overturned a year later without the benefit of additional studies proving aspartame safety. Today the artificial sweetener aspartame may be added to all foods, drinks, dietary supplements and medications sold in America without restriction. FDA labeling requirements no longer require aspartame to be specifically listed as an ingredient. Considering the controversial history of this synthetic sweetener, blanket government approval for its inclusion in any consumable product is suspect—particularly when it is estimated that the substance can be fatal to the world's 20 million phenylketoneurics (or PKU carriers—those who cannot metabolize the amino acid phenylalanine). There is mounting evidence that mothers using aspartame during pregnancy or while breastfeeding can pass PKU onto their children. The inability to metabolize phenylalanine can cause mental retardation. The presence of aspartame in our food supply is setting the stage for millions of people to suffer retarded neurological development. Regardless that the aspartame approval process was mired in controversy and its developer GD Searle was being investigated by a federal grand jury for fraud, Searle CEO Donald Rumsfeld achieved limited approval for use of aspartame in dry goods by 1981. Since that time, aspartame has become a multi-billion industry with powerful lobbying influence in Washington, D.C. There are no independently performed studies regarding the long-term physiological effects of aspartame being cited to support claims that it is a safe substitute for sugar. Yet the general public believes aspartame is safe because it has the seal of government approval. There are, however, scores of independently performed and published scientific reports and hundreds of case studies available to government regulators in the FDA linking the use of aspartame to the same symptoms described in the FDA's own list of 92 potential adverse effects associated with the use of aspartame (See page 10). It is reported that aspartame was once on a list of chemical biowarfare agents the Department of Defense submitted to Congress. At present, an estimated 200 million Americans consume at least 5,000 products containing 15,000 tons of aspartame each year, making it the most widely distributed and commercially successful biowarfare agent ever produced. It is ironic that then Searle CEO Rumsfeld, after having served as secretary of defense, muscled the approval of aspartame and is, once again, 20 years later, serving as secretary of defense as the disastrous effects of aspartame become epidemic. |
|
|
|
CDC reports Sudden Cardiac Death nation's #1 killer Biochemical evidence indicates aspartame behind this curious epidemic from Mission Possible The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), the nation's #1 killer, prematurely ended the lives of 460,000 Americans in 1999. The numbers appear to be climbing. When the heart stops abruptly without warning, the diagnosis is SCD. It kills its victims within minutes. It is estimated that 95 percent of victims die before reaching the hospital. Often SCD happens to outwardly healthy people such as high school, college and professional athletes and thousands of children with no history of heart problems. New York State has mandated automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) be provided for all schools and athletic events on or off campus. Illinois passed a similar law. In tame in the mid-80s. "[SCD is] an electrical problem in which the cardiac conduction system that generates the impulses regulating the heart suddenly puts out rapid or chaotic electrical impulses, or both. The heart ceases its rhythmic contractions, the brain is starved of oxygen and the victim loses consciousness in seconds," he added. CDC reports and statistics are yet another indication the government is aware that aspartame is poisoning the American public, sometimes fatally, but refuses to order its removal from the nation's food supply. Detailed analyses of the nation's new #1 killer and the biochemical pathways implicating the presence of aspartame in most, if not all, cases of Americans simply dropping dead for no apparent reason, are available at www.dorway.com or wnho.net Page 13
The effects of aspartame on infants and children It has been known for centuries that methanol is a neurotoxin. Therefore we should minimize infants and children exposure to products containing it. Aspartame not only contains 10 percent free methanol, additional methanol is created as aspartame metabolizes in the body. No safe limit for methanol has ever been determined. That means any level of exposure to methanol is unsafe. Just imagine the damage daily doses of methanol-containing aspartame could have on the central nervous systems of infants and children. Now go to your nearest grocery store and look at all the aspartame-containing products being marketed to children and ask yourself: Could this be one of the reasons why the numbers of neurologically-impaired and sociopathic children requiring special care and instruction are rising at an alarming rate?
WARNING: School children at risk! The Institutes of Medicine has declared war on childhood obesity. Opportunists in the beverage industry have responded by declaring war on obese children. To capitalize on the marketplace niche opening as schools ban the sale of sugar drinks on school grounds, companies such as American WaterSTar have announced their intention to market a new line of artificially flavored and sweetened waters for school children. While over consumption of sugar is not healthy and banning sales of sugar-containing junk food on school campuses is a good idea, replacing sugar with aspartame is not the answer. Following is Dr. H.J. Robert's open warning to parents and schools regarding childrens' consumption of aspartame-containing drinks. The momentum for reducing the amount of soda pop consumed by children, especially from dispensing machines at schools, has increased. It is justified by the documented contribution of the sugar therein to serious disorders, especially obesity and other problems. Imaginative entrepreneurs now seek to substitute an array of palatable "sugar free, caffeine free," and "calorie free" drinks having appealing brand names. They plan to actively promote them to students and school systems, using celebrities such as professional athletes as pitchmen. Unfortunately, there is a major public health problem when aspartame– commonly known as NutraSweet® and Equal® – is the sweetening agent. I have repeatedly stated my professional opinion, based on the scores of children in my database of aspartame reactors, that they should not take aspartame products–including beverages, foods, vitamins, drugs, gum and supplements. Each of the components of this chemical (phenylalanine; aspartic acid; the methyl ester, which promptly becomes FREE methyl alcohol) and their multiple breakdown products can damage the developing brain. Aspartame-induced disorders in children include headache, confusion, convulsions, irritability, depression, intellectual deterioration, antisocial behavior, rashes, asthma and unstable diabetes. Addiction to aspartame products also has become a problem. The details appear in my publications, particularly Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic (www.sunsentpress.com). There also are reservations about the long-term use of sucralose, another popular sweetening agent, in these substitute drinks because of the adverse effects noted in animal studies. In view of this perceived imminent public health threat, I believe that parents, physicians, other health care professionals, school boards and consumer advocates have an obligation to monitor and guide their communities regarding such exposure. They can expect formidable corporate and bureaucratic resistance, particularly from the FDA and groups supported by this huge industry. H.
J. Roberts, M.D., FACP, FCCP Observations from Dr. Miguel Baret Daniel of the Dominican Republic: A pediatrician friend of mine and I have been giving nutritional support to children with diabetes. Since cow's milk has a specific protein which causes diabetes, especially in children, I remove milk from their diet. I removed milk from the diets of about 360 children studying in public schools in my country. Though these 360 children were not diabetics, I removed the milk from their diet for diabetes prevention. At one point my pediatrician friend and I started noticing that a considerable number of these 360 children were exhibiting abnormal levels of restlessness, a lack of concentration, irritability and depression, in some. At the beginning I suspected it was happening because the extreme heat we were having in my country in those days. But then the weather changed and the situation didn't get better. So, I took a look at their diet and discovered ALL of them were drinking a lot of one kind of concentrated juice sweetened with ASPARTAME. They drank some six ounces of that juice twice a day, some times between classes. So, I talked to their parents and asked them to press upon their children that they should not drink that juice anymore for a while. The results were as astonishing as the very situation I was trying to correct: The symptoms disappeared in 4-5 days in ALL of them. Note: Dr. Baret, an orthomolecular medicine practitioner and naturopath, became so interested in knowing more about Nutrasweet and/or aspartame he has asked Mission Possible to help him write a simple pamphlet about aspartame for distribution to school administrators in the Dominican Republic. Page 14
Wife, mother (not aspartame) convicted of poisoning husband Fleming's chances for post-conviction relief dashed by medical examiner capable of moving bullet wounds for political reasons
RICHMOND, Virginia—Diane Fleming's hopes that her murder conviction would be reversed were scuttled March 2, 2004. Virginia State Chief Medical Examiner Marcella Fierro told Fleming's attorney that no evidence links Chuck Fleming's January 2000 death to aspartame consumption. When her husband suddenly sickened and died while the family and guests from out of town were celebrating their son's high school graduation, the autopsy report showed "acute and chronic methanol poisoning." In a two-day trial Chuck's death was blamed on Diane who allegedly spiked her husband's Gatorade with wood alcohol from an unopened gallon of windshield wiper fluid found in the garage. Diane was convicted and is serving a 50-year sentence. Sadly, Fleming's attorney did not challenge the credibility of the medical examiner, nor her opinions. Fierro once authorized a revised autopsy report in the death of Vince Foster in 1993. Foster was President Clinton's Chief of Counsel. Fierro's alteration allowed Foster's apparent murder to appear as a suicide. Had the original entry location stood, the suicide conclusion would have been hard to explain since few suicides shoot themselves in the back of the head. The laboriously documented investigation of Foster's controversial death is detailed by British journalist Ambrose Evans Pritchard in "The Secret Lives of Bill Clinton." X-rays of Foster's skull, noted in the original autopsy report, would verify the actual location of the wound, but they "mysteriously disappeared." The meeting was scheduled at the insistence of Dr. H.J. Roberts, author of "Aspartame Disease, An Ignored Epidemic" and Mission Possible International founder Dr. Betty Martini, in an effort to have Fleming's "murder" sentence commuted due to new evidence. Knowing in advance that Dr. Fierro was to appear at the meeting and hear testimony by Dr. H. J. Roberts, but not knowing about her role in the Vince Foster cover-up, Martini forwarded a 14-page, peer-reviewed article by Dr. Woodrow Monte of the Arizona University Food and Science Laboratory that had been published in "The Journal of Applied Nutrition." Dr. Fierro acknowledged she had received the material and agreed to consult with Dr. Roberts. However, at the actual meeting, Dr. Fierro told Diane's attorney no peer reviewed medical evidence exists supporting Dr. Robert's theory that Chuck Fleming's chronic methanol toxicity was caused by his long-term consumption of aspartame. Martini and Dr. Roberts, who have invested a lot of effort in the Fleming case, were extremely disappointed Dr. Fierro would refuse to admit the testimony to prove Diane's innocence. Martini is convinced Fierro's history of complicity in the Foster cover-up clarified her actions in the Fleming case. Both Martini and Roberts have filed formal complaints regarding Fierro's conduct with the State of Virginia. Martini's complaint cited events leading up to the hearing and the scientific qualifications of the evidence supporting the innocence of Fleming. Martini asserted, "Dr. Fierro's unprofessional and arbitrary conduct requires a full and open examination of the mechanisms of aspartame/methanol toxicity as they relate to the death of Charles Fleming. There are literally volumes documenting how aspartame triggers methanol poisoning. It is obvious by refusing to look at the evidence, Dr. Fierro doesn't want it on the record. The question is, ‘Why?'" Two film crews, one from the Netherlands, have interviewed Fleming in prison. One, Sound and Fury Productions, will feature Fleming's story in its soon-to-be released film, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World." Advance orders are being taken by calling Cori at 520-624-9710; email cori@soundandfuryproductions.com. Aspartame disease, or Rumsfeld's disease (see pages 2, 20), is an international epidemic that is not being acknowledged by a government that approved its use in spite of being fully aware of its potential lethality.
Aspartame Material Safety Data SheetProduct Number: 858900 Product Name: L-Aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester, 96% Label Precautionary Statements Harmful, Possible Sensitizer, Wear Suitable Protective Clothing First Aid Measures In case of contact, flush eyes with copious amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. In case of contact, immediately wash skin with skin and copious amounts of water. If inhaled, remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. If swallowed, wash out mouth with water provided person is conscious. Call a physician. Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. Fire fighting measures Extinguishing media Water spray, carbon dioxide, dry chemical powder or appropriate foam. Special firefighting procedures Wear self-contained breathing apparatus and protective clothing to prevent contact with skin and eyes. Unusual fire and explosion hazards Emits toxic fumes under fire conditions. Accidental release measures Wear NIOSH/MSHA-approved respirator, chemical safety goggles, rubber boots and heavy rubber gloves. Sweep up, place in bag and hold for waste disposal. Avoid raising dust. Ventilate area [with mechanical exhaust] and wash spill site after material pickup is complete. Avoid inhalation. Avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. Avoid prolonged or repeated exposure. Wash thoroughly after handling. Toxicological information Acute effects May be harmful by inhalation, ingestion or skin absorption. May cause eye irritation. May cause skin irritation. Prolonged or repeated exposure may cause allergic reactions in certain sensitive individuals. To the best of our knowledge, the chemical, physical and toxicological properties have not been thoroughly investigated. Warning to persons with phenylketoneuria! This material can release phenylalanine Environmental considerations Data not yet available. Disposal considerations Dissolve or mix the material with a combustible solvent and burn in a chemical incinerator equipped with an afterburner and scrubber. Page 15
Daily records indicate nationwide epidemic of unexplained deaths Group seeks CDC investigation and to alert nation's medical examiners
ANAHEIM, Calif.—Between July 11 and November 15, 2003, the Orange County Register listed 192 people in the area as dying "of causes yet to be determined." Orange county resident Barbara Benson took it upon herself to scan the obituaries in the Orange County Register every weekday for five months. On some days as many as seven people, with ages ranging from one year to 89 years, were listed as dying from causes that were unknown at the time of death. "Ever since reading about aspartame in The Idaho Observer about six months ago, I began noticing that quite a few people in our county were dying ‘of causes yet to be determined.' That means people are dying suddenly and the medical examiners don't know why," commented Benson. Benson's observations are supported by a report recently released by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) that estimates nearly half a million Americans die each year from sudden cardiac death (SCD). SCD, which is now the nation's number one killer, is characterized by the heart stopping suddenly without warning. Story page 12 "I believe that the artificial sweetener aspartame is playing an active role in this epidemic of unexplained deaths," commented H.J. Roberts, MD. Dr. Roberts is the author of Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, the world's most comprehensive analysis of aspartame and its toxic effects on the human body. He has drafted a memo explaining the effects of aspartame on the human body and what medical examiners should be looking for in determining aspartame-related deaths. Don Harkins of The Idaho Observer forwarded copies of the raw data to CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding with a well-cited and referenced letter asking the nation's epidemiological watchdog to investigate the epidemic of unexplained deaths in Orange County. Dr. Robert's memo was attached to the letter. The entire package was forwarded to the CDC via certified mail Dec. 10, 2003. Dr. Gerberding responded March 10, 2004. In her letter she did not indicate any alarm that so many deaths were the result of unknown causes. She did, however, explain that the proper procedure would be to first contact the state medical examiner who, if concerned, would then contact the CDC. To collect the data, Benson simply read the obituaries five days each week. She clipped every obituary that failed to identify the cause of death and taped them to pieces of paper in chronological order. She then labeled each one with the date and underlined the age of each deceased person. She also underlined, "causes yet to be determined." Help Mission Possible demand further investigation by cutting and clipping obituaries in one-month increments and send them to Mission Possible (See contact info page 17). "If we send the CDC evidence that thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of Americans simply dropped dead in spring, 2004, how can it deny the need to investigate the causes of this mysterious epidemic?" Martini asked. Dr. Robert's memo is also available at www.dorway.com. With the help of concerned citizens, Mission Possible intends to make sure the nation's medical examiners have the tools to explain the epidemic of unexplained deaths in America. Page 16 "Safe for kids and pregnant women" says industry advocate Calorie Council attempts to keep USS Aspartame from sinking off Florida coast MIAMI, Fla.—Beth Hubrich of the Calorie Council, an international association representing the low-calorie and reduced-fat food and beverage industry, recently had comments published in The Miami Herald that world-renowned neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, author of "Excitotoxins, The Taste that Kills," believes to be among the most irresponsible public comments ever made. In response to an article that appeared in The Herald Jan. 10, 2004, Hubrich stated, "We appreciate the factual information that you provided. Pregnant women and those with advanced liver disease can consume aspartame, according to the FDA as well as the Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association. An American Academy of Pediatrics task force, too, has concluded that aspartame is safe for both the mother and developing baby." Hubrich went on to explain that aspartame breaks down in the body to phenylalanine, aspartic acid and methanol, which are commonly found in the diets of pregnant and breast-feeding women. "Aspartame never enters the bloodstream and therefore cannot travel to essential organs, including the liver," Hubrich stated and added, "Those with phenylketonuria can consume products containing aspartame but must limit the amount from all sources." Dr. Blaylock disagrees. "There is not one long-term study of aspartame safety ever conducted on the offspring of pregnant women consuming aspartame. Yet, there are numerous studies indicating aspartame could pose a serious danger to both mother and infant." Citing a study on maternal PKU, Dr. Blaylock stated "...that fully a third of all babies born to PKU carrier mothers consuming aspartame foods and drinks risk varying degrees of brain damage." As for aspartame not entering the bloodstream, Dr. Blaylock noted, "... it is also known that the amount of toxic phenylalanine reaching the baby is twice as high as that in the mother's blood because the placenta concentrates the toxin." Mission Possible sees Hubrich's willingness to promote the use of aspartame in breastfeeding women, children, people with advanced liver disease and phenylketoneuriks as a sign that the USS Aspartame is sinking. In her zeal to promote the use of aspartame, "Hubrich even forgot to cite the industry's own studies cautioning against use of aspartame in the types of individuals she mentioned," said Mission Possible Director Betty Martini.
Where's the aspartame? Aspartame can be found on the ingredients list in the following products: Soft drinks, over-the-counter drugs and prescription drugs (very common and listed under "inactive ingredients"), vitamin and herb supplements, yogurt, instant breakfasts, candy, breath mints, cereals, sugar-free chewing gum, cocoa mixes, coffee beverages, gelatin desserts, frozen desserts, juice beverages, laxatives, milk drinks, shake mixes, tabletop sweeteners, tea beverages, instant teas and coffees, topping mixes and wine coolers. Please check labels carefully and compare them against the list of "Sweeteners to Avoid" at right. Many people make the mistake of not checking labels carefully and continue to poison themselves. (Note: In some countries such as Australia, the word "aspartame" may not appear on the label, but the phrase "Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine" appears instead). Also, some drug and supplement manufacturers are allowed to avoid listing aspartame on the label if they state the words, "contains phenylalanine." In addition, many people do not realize that their children may be given aspartame or other artificial sweetener-containing foods or drugs at school without their knowledge. Talk to the school director and to the local PTA to assure that this does not happen.
Excitotoxins Excitotoxins were discovered in 1957 by two ophthalmologists testing how MSG affects the vision of mice. A growing number of clinicians and scientists today are convinced excitotoxins play a critical role in the development of neurological disorders such as migraines, seizures, infections, abnormal neural development, certain endocrine disorders, learning disorders in children, AIDS dementia, episodic violence, depression and obesity. Excitotoxins are also linked to the development of neuro-degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease [and multiple sclerosis], wrote neuroscientist Russell Blaylock, MD. The most commonly consumed excitotoxins are aspartame, monosodium glutamate (MSG) and hydrolyzed vegetable protein (which is commonly listed on product labels as "natural flavors, natural flavoring, spices, yeast extract, textured protein" and "soy protein extract"). Since 1948 the amount of MSG added to foods has doubled every decade. Over 800 million pounds of aspartame have been consumed in various products since it was first approved in 1981. Hydrolyzed vegetable protein is found in a steadily-increasing array of foods found at the grocery store. Today, at least one of these excitotoxins is present in nearly every packaged food product. For example, soups often contain three or more excitotoxins in the form of flavor enhancers, and many breads contain L-cysteine as a dough conditioner. In the body, L-cysteine converts to the powerful excitotoxin cystein sulfinic acid. Additionally, excitotoxins have been found to interact with food additives and pharmaceutical preparations with adverse (even lethal) results. Dr. Blaylock's brief description of excitotoxins can be found in his article Excitotoxins, Neurodegeneration and Neurodevelopment," at www.dorway.com A more detailed analysis is found in his well-referenced book, "Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills (See page 23).
Healthy Sweetener Use Guide
Sweeteners to Use Stevia * Barley Malt Evaporated Cane Juice Fruit Juice Rice Syrup Honey Licorice Root (small amounts) Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) * Amasake Vegetable Glycerin Xylitol*
Sweeteners to Avoid Aspartame Neotame Sucralose (Splenda) Saccharin Acesulfame-K (Sunette, Sweet & Safe, Sweet One) Cyclamates Refined Sugar # High Fructose Sweeteners # Sorbitol #
*Safe for diabetics # Can be used in very small amounts Source: www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/detox.html
It should also be noted that Neotame, which is reportedly 13,000 times sweeter than sugar by weight, may not be listed on product labels because the FDA does not require listing ingredients comprising less than one percent of product composition. Page 17
Kicking the sweet habit Tips to regain your health through an aspartame detoxification program compiled by Ingri Cassel The first step in any detoxification program is to stop exposure to the toxins causing our health problems. Become an avid label reader and avoid instant or prepackaged food in general. Buy organic grains, nuts, beans, fruits, vegetables and herbs while learning how to cook from scratch. The second step is to eliminate the craving for the substance causing our ill health. In the case of aspartame, it is essential to restore depleted nutrients by taking a high quality B-complex supplement as well as a multi-mineral supplement. Liquid supplements or supplements in capsules are much more assimilable than supplements in tablet form. It is also important to drink a minimum of eight glasses of purified water a day while eliminating dehydrating drinks such as coffee, black tea, alcohol and carbonated beverages. Plenty of chlorine and fluoride-free, filtered water is necessary for our bodies to eliminate the accumulation of toxic residues and heavy metals stored in our fatty tissues. A vast majority of the populace is severely dehydrated as Dr. F. Batmanghelidj in his book "Your Body's Many Cries for Water" reveals. This is one of the most powerful aspects of any detoxification program. The best resource on the Internet about the importance of water with several case histories cited is www.watercure2.com In his book, "Health and Nutrition Secrets to Save Your Life," Dr. Russell Blaylock details an intensive aspartame detox regimen. (see resources page 23) In the case of aspartame as well as most other toxins, our body's main filter, the liver, is congested and needs to be supported in the cleansing process. For information on liver cleanses and herbs to support liver function, read Dr. Sandra Cabot's book, "The Liver Cleansing Diet Book" (888-752-4286). Also, Dr. Richard Schulze is an expert on natural healing and "saying it like it is" when it comes to how your body works as well as how you can recover naturally from "incurable" diseases. Call 1-800-HERBDOC and ask for Dr. Schulze's comprehensive newsletter on the liver or go to his website www.herbdoc.com Colon cleansing is also an essential part of the detoxification process as you will find out from Dr. Schulze and countless other naturopaths. Other important aspects of detoxification are oxygenation, copious amounts of Vitamin C, consuming lots of raw fruits and vegetables, drinking raw fresh juice made with your own juicer, and proper application of certain types of clay both internally and externally. Dr. Janet Starr Hull, author of "Sweet Poison," recommends using French green clay internally and we know of many people who have excellent results with magnetic clay baths for detoxing from mercury, aluminum and barium, as well as formaldehyde and DKP—the metabolic byproducts of aspartame. Go to www.magneticclay.co or www.idetoxamin.com But the most important and most commonly overlooked aspect of any healing program is its spiritual, mental and emotional components, known today as psycho-neuro-immunology. 1. Take control of your life by loving yourself and your life through positive affirmations. 2. Learn to forgive yourself and those around you. 3. Take responsibility for your personal life, cleaning up strained relationships. 4. Meditate, follow your spirit and pray. 5. Help someone everyday. For books and websites on specific programs for detoxing from aspartame poisoning, refer to the resource list on page 23. You can meet others who have successfully detoxed from aspartame by participating in discussion groups found at: Mission Possible Aspartame Disease Class Action Do you or anyone you know suffer from one or more of the symptoms described in The Artificially Sweetened Times? Do you now have reason to believe they may be related to your consumption of products containing aspartame? Do you wish to be included in a class action? Write up your case history, make copies of supporting documents and send them to: Mrs. Betty Martini 9270 River Club Parkway Duluth, Georgia 30097 (770) 242-2599 New medical text on the global plague of Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic at www.aspartameispoison.com or call 1-800-827-7991 WANTED: Looking for insider reports. Human subjects in locations all over the world have been used to test aspartame without their knowledge or consent. Mission Possible has obtained some of these shocking reports but knows there are more of them out there. Contact Mission Possible—(770) 242-2599 Page 18 The Unofficial History of Neotame The FDA recently approved the use of Monsanto's new artificial sweetener Neotame. Though nearly identical to aspartame, Monsanto added 3-dimethylbutyl (listed by the EPA as a most hazardous chemical) to create Neotame, which is reportedly 13,000 times sweeter than sugar by weight. Not much is known at this time what it took for Monsanto to accomplish FDA approval for this potent new synthetic sweetener entirely composed of known toxins. But, based on the well-documented history of the aspartame approval process, Mark Gold of the Aspartame Toxicity Center wrote the following satire. by Mark Gold In 1993, a former Monsanto scientist was working at a secret army chemical weapons plant when there was an accidental release of a newly-developed chemical weapon, neotox-II. After the alarm sounded, other workers ran to the decontamination room. But this man, having learned at Monsanto that chemicals are not something to be afraid of, stood his ground. On the middle finger of his left hand, there had accumulated a tiny amount of neotox-II. He put his finger up to his nose to thoroughly investigate this new chemical. It made him intensely nauseous, but there was also a very strong sweet smell. Believing that sweet means safe, no matter how toxic, he licked his finger. Neotox-II was incredibly sweet! The nausea became intense and his body began to convulse. He didn't seem to care, belting out, "I have found it! I have found it!" at the top of his lungs. When he was released from the army hospital three weeks later, he knew what he had to do. He placed a call to several Monsanto/ NutraSweet executives telling them about the discovery. He had no concern about divulging military secrets as he knew that these Monsanto executives would have no trouble convincing government officials to give the patent and use of neotox-II to Monsanto. "After all," he reminded himself, "Monsanto executives have had so many official government positions, we essentially run the government!" Putting together safety data for the FDA was not a serious challenge. The mixture of neotox-II and standard Monsanto fairy dust led to the production of volumes of safety data. The fairy dust did not change the chemical structure of neotox-II, but did cause the name change to "neotame." All links between neotame and neotox-II were destroyed...except two. The first clue to the relationship between neotox-II and neotame is the symbol used to identify neotame in the marketplace is a picture of the back of the left hand of the former Monsanto scientist, with the finger upon which sweet neotame was first discovered extended for all to see. The only other link to neotox-II is the secret Monsanto source relaying this story.
Editor's comment: An Exercise in self-reliance Admittedly, the research we had already conducted on aspartame convinced us that it is devastating to the human body. Since millions of people consume this government-approved, carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic, non-nutritive synthetic sweetener every day, we were also convinced aspartame is helping to destroy entire nations. That is the real reason this pamphlet had to be published. We were not, however, prepared to find absolutely nothing in support of aspartame approval. All claims in support of aspartame use are, at best, utterly false; all publicly available reports in support of aspartame safety actually prove aspartame toxicity—if one takes the time to read them instead of taking for granted what government and industry tell you they say. |