|Vaccination Liberation - Information|
Ingredients of Vaccines
Artificially Sweetened Times
Books Videos Tapes
100+ Anti-Vax links
Death from Infectious DiseaseIn the graph below, if you place a ruler, horizonally, from where the Salk Vaccine is introduced in 1954, to the graph line in the mid 1990's, you will note that there is no basic improvement in the number of deaths per 100,000 population from infectious diseases.
Why Not? After all, we have
introduced not only the two polio vaccines but several other vaccines as well during this time?
During this time period, 1954 to 1995, death from infectious disease, each year, dropped from 1 per 1250 people to 1 per 2500 people and rose again to 1 per 1250, approximately, based on my measuring the graph. [Figures should not be considered exact, but they are close.]
Keep in mind, this is an average for all age groups. This is one way of understanding that vaccines do not improve mortality rates or add length of life.
You will note in the above graph that the number of measles deaths had dropped to less than 100 per year in the 1950's. This was in a child population which included about 4 million new births per year and was prior to the introduction of measles vaccine in 1961. Measles death rates remained stable for a few additional years, in spite of the vaccinations, and then declined further.
Another way of arriving at this conclusion is to understand that in 1975 when Japan stopped vaccinating children under two years of age, lives were saved! That is, the mortality rate in children under two years of age dropped dramatically as can be seen by this graph.
When a healthy person is vaccinated, typically the insult to the immune system is 'tolerated', but there is no benefit. When immune compromised individuals are exposed to the immune system insult, the result is disaster of one form or another, as the following quote from an article by Dr. Obomsawin shows.
It also bears mentioning that I recently came across a June, 1995 interview with an old acquaintance, the veteran physician to the Aboriginal People of Australia, Dr. Archie Kalokerinos. The interview was published in the International Vaccination Newsletter (Krekenstraat 4, 3600 Genk, Belgium). Archie is in many ways a man deserving of great recognition for his brave struggle with the establishment forces in his country, who attempted to block his efforts to expose and reverse the massive death rates (as high as 50%) being caused by mass immunization in a population at great risk to its dangers. In this interview he states that it was this "extreme hostility" that:Read the rest of the article at: http://www.whale.to/a/obomsawin.html. . . forced me to look into the question of vaccination further, and the further I looked the more shocked I became. I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so . . .
How many lives are lost to vaccine annually in the USA?
From 1991 through 2000, the number of deaths associated with vaccine adverse effects reported to VAERS varied from a low of 146 to a high of 251. In infants, (age less than 1 year) the number of reported deaths varied from a low of 86 to a high of 170. Multiply these figures by 10 for the minimum number of deaths actually occuring. Multiply by 100 for the maximum numbers of deaths. Realistic estimates are that VAERS reports must likely be multiplied by 30 to 50 times.
Therefore, the number of deaths actually caused by vaccines in the US per year would be minimum of 1400 and a maximum of 25,000. Using an average of the above figures, and using a conservative times 30 for realistic under-reporting, gives about 6000 total vaccine caused deaths per year, of which 3800 would be infants.
A typical quoted figure is 3000 children under aged two years.
Another way to estimate death figures for infants, is to multiply the number of SIDS by 50 to 90 percent. Officially, SIDS has declined from 140.1 to 71.6 [per 100,000] in 1998 (15). [From 1998 CDC mortality figures found at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/pdf/nvs48_11t10.pdf.]
According to the CDC, 10 Leading Causes of Death, for 1988, SIDS was 5,476 and Respiratory Distress Syndrome 3,181. For 2000, SIDS was 2,523 and Respiratory Distress Syndrome was 999. Using this method of estimation, and a nominal 80% of SIDS due to vaccines, would yield estimated deaths from vaccine in 1988 as 4380, and in 2000 as 2018 from this syndrome alone. SIDS is the major category which 'hides' death from vaccine.
However, breathing patterns become distressed after vaccination, an uncertain but significant percentage of death from Respiratory Distress is likely related to vaccines.
How many adverse events associated with vaccine occur annually in the USA?The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) receives 10,000 to 14,000 reports yearly in the USA since 1990.
Keeping in mind that these reports are as little as 1 percent and a maximum of 10 percent of the true number of adverse, this means that a minimum of 100,000 and a maximum of 1,400,000 vaccine related adverse events occur per year. A typical conservative estimate is 300,000 adverse events of a serious nature per year occur in the USA.
See http://www.vaclib.org/toc.htm#vaers for links to VAERS articles.
What percentage of Autism, ADD/ADHT, diabetics and asthma is due to vaccine involvement?For information on the relationship between increased autism, ADD/ADHT, diabetics, asthma in the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated:
Let us start by not relying on the words of medical "authorities" in western countries.
A clear illustration of how truly authoritative their assertions are can be seen from looking at what has happened in other countries. For example, Sugiura & Yamada (Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1991;Vol 10(3):209-13) describe what happened in Japan. Very briefly, when the MMR triple vaccine was shown to cause meningitis in 1 in 2026 recipients, not only did the Japanese health authorities recognise the causal link to this vaccine, they also discontinued its use (and also significantly, no unusually large epidemic of any of these infections followed). Not surprisingly, the incidence of vaccine-caused (and overall) meningitis plummeted (the minority who were hell-bent on getting the vaccine could still get it). So, there is a precedent of a whole major country abandoning the offending vaccine and of a recognition of the causal link between the offending vaccines and the observed reactions. Yet despite this, medical "authorities" in other countries, such as Australia, the UK and the US, continue to ignore (or not read?) the research in published, refereed medical journals, and claim that there is only a temporal and coincidental association.