Vaccination Liberation - Information
Legal: Science: Misc: Searches:
Exemptions
  State_Chapter/
Resource_Contacts

Avoid_Vaccinations
Activism
LegalNews
Introduction
Basic_Facts
Package Inserts
Ingredients of Vaccines
Q_and_A
Artificially Sweetened Times
Membership
Books Videos Tapes
100+ Anti-Vax links
Vax_Cartoons
Breaking News
Planned_Events
KeyWord_Index
Index/Link_Pages
Search_Our_Site
Home_Page
Index_Page
Smallpox Alert!

Informed or Indoctrinated?
We do not want to give the impression that the medical profession knows nothing about vaccines.1

None the less, we must state that the majority of the general public, doctors, nurses, veternarians and public health officials support an idea which can be expressed as, "An injected mixture of cow pus, rotting materials and carcinogenic poison is beneficial and even necessary for the well being of children."

We hope our study makes clear the impossibility of such an idea being grounded in scientific fact.

Q. So why the great legal, social and of course financial success of vaccines? [Keep reading, that will become clear.]

Q. Why is the majority of the public in the United States mis-informed about vaccines?
For the same reason the majority of medical people are mis-informed.

Q.Why are the majority of medical personel mis-informed about vaccination?
Because the vast majority of medical schools are mis-informed.

Q. Why are the overwhelming majority of medical schools mis-informed about vaccination?
Because the source of information on vaccine is mis-informed.

Q.So finally, why is the common source of vaccine information mis-informed?
Now at last we have asked a real rocket science question. First, lets focus on the fact that the common source of information is the manufacturers of vaccines. Also it must be acknowledged that the medical schools are basically "owned" by the Pharmaceutical companies. "Owned" here denotes strong influence through money donations, equipment, supplies and 'information'. Thus independent research must be conducted "on a shoe-string" (small finances), and in the face of political pressure to support "the party line."

Better to be Rich than Right?
Vaccine trials are too short in time, too small in size and/or use flawed methodology.

The public does not yet require manufacturers to adaquately scientifically test vaccines. Prehaps a good, yet short, answer is that into the Western world the ideas of inoculation came in the early 1700's prior to a true scientific understanding, and during a time of great fear, great need and thus what is essentially a superstition gave great hope. Only a few gave this 'great hope' any critical examination. To expand on this, no vaccine on the market has ever been subjected to an adaquate, accurate and scientific test for both safety and effectiveness. Of course, greed, power, fear and lack of understanding all combine to further the agenda of those who promote the idea that "a little disease prevents large disease".

Following from: Lots of GREAT Vaccination Quotes

"89% of doctors rely on drug company salesmen for their information." -The Australian Doctor 1989.

"If you want the truth on vaccination you must go to those who are not making anything out of it. If doctors shot at the moon every time it was full as a preventive of measles and got a shilling for it, they would bring statistics to prove it was a most efficient practice, and that the population would be decimated if it were stopped."---Dr Allinson

"Measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, and the whole panoply of childhood diseases are a far less serious threat than having a large fraction (say 10%) of a generation afflicted with learning disability and/or uncontrollable aggressive behaviour because of an impassioned crusade for universal vaccination.......Public policy regarding vaccines is fundamentally flawed. It is permeated by conflicts of interest. It is based on poor scientific methodology (including studies that are too small, too short, and too limited in populations represented), which is, moreover, insulated from independent criticism. The evidence is far too poor to warrant overriding the independent judgements of patients, parents, and attending physicians, even if this were ethically or legally acceptable." --Association Of American Physicians & Surgeons

For more basic information see: Basic Facts

Note 1: Following from: Lots of GREAT Vaccination Quotes
Some doctors refuse to vaccinate their own children as well. According to Dr. Jerome Murphy, former head of PediatricNeurology at Milwaukee Children's Hospital, "There is just overwhelming data that there's an association [between the pertussis vaccine and seizures]. I know it has influenced many paediatric neurologists not to have their own children immunised with pertussis."
And doctors refusing to vaccinate themselves is more common than generally known.
Back to 50+ Q & A